chore: have on demand validity and patches for array remove slot extraction #7217

Performance Regression: -20.76%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 9 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1095 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	498.7 µs	561.2 µs	-11.14%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches`	313.9 µs	284.3 µs	+10.4%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	183.4 µs	231.4 µs	-20.76%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches`	313.8 µs	284.6 µs	+10.26%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	119.4 µs	143.9 µs	-17.05%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_random`	212.5 µs	256.8 µs	-17.25%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_contiguous`	273.4 µs	318 µs	-14.03%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	150.3 µs	168.5 µs	-10.83%
❌	Simulation	`null_count_run_end[(10000, 1024, 0.01)]`	3.7 µs	4.4 µs	-16.11%
❌	Simulation	`null_count_run_end[(10000, 256, 0.01)]`	3.7 µs	4.4 µs	-16.56%
❌	Simulation	`null_count_run_end[(100000, 1024, 0.01)]`	3.7 µs	4.4 µs	-16.11%

_{Comparing ji/val-patches-on-dem (2c5d59b) with develop (0e352e5)}

1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩