Skip to content

array slots #6870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
joseph-isaacs merged 34 commits into from
Mar 31, 2026

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into ji/slots-for-arrays

4dfb89b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

array slots #6870

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into ji/slots-for-arrays
4dfb89b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Mar 31, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -24.74%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 36 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1069 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(10, 1000)] 1.8 ms 2.2 ms -18.65%
❌ Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(100, 100)] 216.9 µs 258.2 µs -16%
⚡ Simulation chunked_constant_i32_append_to_builder[(1000, 10)] 44.8 µs 33.4 µs +34.08%
❌ Simulation filter_all_true[10000] 10.1 µs 12.2 µs -16.96%
❌ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768] 149.1 µs 179.4 µs -16.86%
❌ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] 118.3 µs 149 µs -20.61%
❌ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] 182.4 µs 242.3 µs -24.74%
❌ Simulation old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] 297.9 µs 332.8 µs -10.49%
❌ Simulation old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768] 398.1 µs 448.6 µs -11.26%
❌ Simulation new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384] 131.2 µs 154.9 µs -15.32%
❌ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768] 131 µs 145.9 µs -10.22%
❌ Simulation take_10k_contiguous 270.9 µs 330.8 µs -18.1%
❌ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384] 101.5 µs 117.4 µs -13.53%
❌ Simulation take_10k_random 209.1 µs 270.2 µs -22.62%
❌ Simulation old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] 473.4 µs 538.6 µs -12.11%
❌ Simulation decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.95)] 13.5 µs 15.8 µs -14.91%
❌ Simulation decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 1.0)] 13.4 µs 15.8 µs -14.94%
❌ Simulation decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.25)] 13.7 µs 15.8 µs -13.49%
❌ Simulation decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.95)] 15.3 µs 17.5 µs -12.78%
❌ Simulation decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.25)] 13.6 µs 15.9 µs -14.48%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Comparing ji/slots-for-arrays (4dfb89b) with develop (60aba91)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ