feat: use tree-sitter to parse requirements.txt more correctly#391
Draft
Strum355 wants to merge 1 commit intoguacsec:mainfrom
Draft
feat: use tree-sitter to parse requirements.txt more correctly#391Strum355 wants to merge 1 commit intoguacsec:mainfrom
Strum355 wants to merge 1 commit intoguacsec:mainfrom
Conversation
e29bf41 to
cd46b6f
Compare
cd46b6f to
d906a56
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Replaced the original manual "parsing" of requirements.txt with a proper tree-sitter based approach. For more info on tree-sitter see https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/
Related issues (if any): #242
Checklist
Additional information
Tested this with https://github.com/fabric8-analytics/fabric8-analytics-vscode-extension, some changes required there will be included in the PR that bumps the version of this library too